FACT – Second Amendment Was Written About Military Grade Weaponry


The ability of the people to possess military-grade weaponry was seen as a means to maintain a balance of power between the government and its citizens. This interpretation is: TRUE

  • A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
  • The first battle of the American Revolution was at Lexington, Massachusetts, over military grade weaponry.
  • British soldiers tried to confiscate cannons from the Minutemen Militia.


According to history, the Second Amendment was written as a means of protecting the populace from the potentiality of a tyrannical regime gaining power. It specifically pertained to the use of military hardware by “the people” (AKA, civilians) stating finally: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Breaking It Down

In legal interpretation, the term “the people” has been understood to encompass individuals in their personal capacity, as opposed to government entities or officials. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized “the people” as referring to individuals and their rights in various contexts throughout constitutional jurisprudence.

According to the founding father’s documents, “a well regulated militia” refers to the ability to unite “the people” to take up arms against a common enemy. Originally, there was no standing US Army, only militiamen united against the common enemy of Britain.

Legalese is not the same as spoken language. This rule has multiple sections, denoted by commas. Perhaps it would be better understood if written like this…

II. A well regulated Militia:
Being necessary to the security of a free state
The right of “the people” to keep and bear Arms

Historical Evidence

Title: The Battle of Lexington: Igniting the Flames of Revolution


The Battle of Lexington, which took place on April 19, 1775, marks a pivotal moment in American history. This significant clash between British soldiers and colonial militiamen in the town of Lexington, Massachusetts, not only served as the opening skirmish of the American Revolutionary War but also embodied the escalating tensions between the American colonies and their British rulers. In this article, we will explore the causes that led to this fateful battle, ultimately fueling the flames of revolution.


By the 1770s, the relationship between Britain and its American colonies had become increasingly strained. British policies, such as the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, and Townshend Acts, imposed taxes and duties on the colonies, which many colonists deemed unfair and unjust. The cry of “no taxation without representation” reverberated throughout the colonies as they resented being taxed by a government in which they had no voice.

The immediate catalyst for the Battle of Lexington was the heightened tensions surrounding the British government’s efforts to disarm colonial militias and seize colonial military supplies. The British authorities sought to assert control and suppress the growing unrest in the colonies. The colonies, on the other hand, saw the actions of the British as a violation of their rights and an encroachment on their freedom.

Events Leading to the Battle:

On April 18, 1775, General Thomas Gage, the British governor of Massachusetts, received intelligence that the colonists were stockpiling weapons and ammunition in the towns of Lexington and Concord. Gage ordered a detachment of approximately 700 British troops to march from Boston to seize these supplies and arrest prominent colonial leaders.

The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere and William Dawes:

To alert the colonial militias of the British movements, messengers Paul Revere and William Dawes set out on horseback to spread the news. They rode through the night, warning the colonists in towns and villages along their route, including Lexington and Concord.

The Battle of Lexington:

As dawn broke on April 19, 1775, British troops reached Lexington, where they encountered a small group of colonial militiamen, known as the Lexington Minutemen, led by Captain John Parker. Both sides were tense and uncertain of the other’s intentions. Amidst the confusion, a shot was fired, and the battle commenced. The exact source of the shot remains disputed, with some speculating it was accidental, while others believe it was a deliberate provocation.

Although outnumbered and outgunned, the Lexington militiamen stood their ground, engaging the British troops in a brief exchange of gunfire. However, the colonists eventually dispersed, and the British moved on to Concord, where they hoped to find and destroy the colonial military supplies.

Legacy and Significance:

While the Battle of Lexington itself was a relatively small-scale engagement, its significance lies in its symbolic impact. It represented the first armed confrontation between colonial forces and the British army, setting the stage for the larger conflict that would follow. The battles of Lexington and Concord galvanized colonial sentiment against the British and ignited a revolutionary spirit that spread throughout the colonies.

The events of that fateful day became a rallying cry for the American patriots. The shot fired at Lexington became known as the “shot heard ’round the world,” symbolizing the beginning of a global struggle for independence and the birth of a new nation.


The Battle of Lexington holds a prominent place in American history, marking the first military engagement that initiated the Revolutionary War. The clash between the British troops and colonial militiamen in Lexington embodied the mounting tensions and grievances that had accumulated over years of British colonial rule.

The attempts by British soldiers to confiscate military-grade weaponry from the American militias did have an influence on the development of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, it is essential to understand that the Second Amendment was shaped by a combination of factors and not solely by the events at Lexington.

The Second Amendment, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The colonists’ experiences during the Revolutionary War, including the Battle of Lexington, played a role in shaping the Founding Fathers’ thinking regarding the importance of an armed citizenry as a safeguard against tyranny and as a means of preserving individual liberties. The colonists had witnessed firsthand the potential abuses of power by a standing army, and sought to prevent a similar situation in the newly formed United States.

The concept of an armed citizenry was deeply rooted in the colonial and early American mindset. The colonists believed that the right to bear arms was essential for self-defense, protection against external threats, and as a deterrent against potential tyranny from both foreign and domestic sources. The ability of the people to possess military-grade weaponry was seen as a means to maintain a balance of power between the government and its citizens.

While the Battle of Lexington served as a powerful example of British attempts to disarm the colonists, the Second Amendment’s drafting and ratification were influenced by a broader range of historical, philosophical, and political factors. These included the English common law tradition, the right to self-defense, the philosophical writings of Enlightenment thinkers, and the lessons learned from the American Revolutionary War.